A Warehouse Allocation Example using Julia

2 minute read

This post has been upgraded to use Julia 1.1 and JuMP 0.19.

Location of WarehousesPermalink

This is based on Example 5.1 (Location of Warehouses) from Applied Linear Programming

A firm has 5 distribution centers and we want to determine which subset of these should serve as a site for a warehouse. The goal is the build a minimum number of warehouses that can cover all distribution centers so that every warehouse is within 10 miles of each distribution center.

Per the problem statement, m is the number of distribution centers.

We are given a table of distances between distribution centers, D:

m = 5
max_miles = 10

D = [0 10 15 20 18;
     10 0 20 15 10;
     15 20 0 8 17;
     20 15 8 0 5;
     18 10 17 5 0
    ]
5×5 Array{Int64,2}:
  0  10  15  20  18
 10   0  20  15  10
 15  20   0   8  17
 20  15   8   0   5
 18  10  17   5   0

For example, it is 18 miles between distribution centers 1 (column 1) and 5 (row 5).

To convert this to a binary coverage vector A, we convert each distance into a binary variable indicating whether the distribution centers are 10 or fewer miles from one another:

A = [Int(D[i, j] <= max_miles) for i=1:m, j=1:m]
5×5 Array{Int64,2}:
 1  1  0  0  0
 1  1  0  0  1
 0  0  1  1  0
 0  0  1  1  1
 0  1  0  1  1

Now we can model this problem using the JuMP package and the (open source) Cbc solver:

(First we import the relevant packages)

using JuMP, Cbc
model = Model(with_optimizer(Cbc.Optimizer))

# decision variable (binary): whether to build warehouse near distribution center i
@variable(model, y[1:m], Bin)

# Objective: minimize number of warehouses
@objective(model, Min, sum(y))

# Constraint: has to cover all warehouses
# (.>= is the element-wise dot comparison operator)
@constraint(model, A*y .>= 1)

model
miny1+y2+y3+y4+y5Subject toy1+y21y1+y2+y51y3+y41y3+y4+y51y2+y4+y51yi{0,1}i{1,2,3,4,5}

We have an additional constraint that at least 1 warehouse should be within 10 miles of distribution center 1, but our activity matrix A already covers that, so technically we do not need this explicit constraint.

@constraint(model, y[1] + y[2] >= 1)
y1+y21
# Solve problem using MIP solver
optimize!(model)
println("Total # of warehouses: ", objective_value(model))

println("Build warehouses at distribution center(s):")

for i=1:m
    if value(y[i]) == 1 
        println("Warehouse $i")
    end
end
Total # of warehouses: 2.0
Build warehouses at distribution center(s):
Warehouse 2
Warehouse 3

We should build warehouses at distribution centers 2 and 3.

Updated:

Comments